Specify Books Concering The Nicomachean Ethics

Original Title:	Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια
ISBN:	0140449493 (ISBN13: 9780140449495)
Edition Language:	English

The Nicomachean Ethics Paperback | Pages: 329 pages

Explanation Toward Books The Nicomachean Ethics

‘One swallow does not make a summer; neither does one day. Similarly neither can one day, or a brief space of time, make a man blessed and happy’ In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle sets out to examine the nature of happiness. He argues that happiness consists in ‘activity of the soul in accordance with virtue’, for example with moral virtues, such as courage, generosity and justice, and intellectual virtues, such as knowledge, wisdom and insight. The Ethics also discusses the nature of practical reasoning, the value and the objects of pleasure, the different forms of friendship, and the relationship between individual virtue, society and the State. Aristotle’s work has had a profound and lasting influence on all subsequent Western thought about ethical matters. J. A. K. Thomson’s translation has been revised by Hugh Tredennick, and is accompanied by a new introduction by Jonathan Barnes. This edition also includes an updated list for further reading and a new chronology of Aristotle’s life and works. Previously published as Ethics

List Out Of Books The Nicomachean Ethics

Title	:	The Nicomachean Ethics
Author	:	Aristotle
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Special Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 329 pages
Published	:	January 29th 2004 by Penguin Classics (first published -340)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Classics. Nonfiction. Politics

Rating Out Of Books The Nicomachean Ethics

Ratings: 3.95 From 32422 Users | 922 Reviews

Rate Out Of Books The Nicomachean Ethics

The introduction goes through the word 'ethics' and how Aristotle meant something different - more about character.Also by happiness he meant something different.There exists an indeterminancy of translation: you can never have a perfect translation - but translations are to be judged by how closely they bring about the same sensations as the original work.So I think the translation of this book is not bad, but misleading- and it'd be better to use the original Greek words for these complex

Im a bit annoyed I wrote up my review to this last night and thought Id posted it, but it seems to have gone to godnot happy about that (amusingly enough). This is my reconstruction of last nights review.There is a story that is almost certainly apocryphal about a French woman (in the version I know, this is Madame De Gaulle) who is in England towards the end of her husbands career and is asked at some sort of official function what she wants most from life. She answers, a penis which,

Such an impressive book that it's honestly hard to do it justice. The philosophical distinctions that Aristotle introduces here -- the three types of friendship, hexis as the key to understanding moral action, the vice/virtue distinction, the spoudaios, etc. etc. -- are impressive enough on their own that any one of them could be the basis of an entire philosophical school in any century. But when you realize that Aristotle was literally the first writer in the Greek tradition to deeply consider

Aristotle's most polished book is still a diamond in the rough, and the student must still be the one to smooth the edges. It's not an easy task, but a worthy one, if only to admire the precision of his thinking. Aristotle is a scientist in style and personality, which raises a serious question right at the outset: "Is human happiness a science?" He seems to say that it is not, but then he proceeds with a scientific analysis, because as a scientist he has no alternative. It is a curious

The chief problem with approaching Aristotle is that he is dry. This is not just because wrote many years ago, and everything written in such a different intellectual climate will seem difficult (no modern reader will identify with many things he takes for granted). He is simply a dry and unadorned writer, and any translation will inevitable convey this quite frankly.All the same, it is difficult to express how influential he has been - and his ethics in particular. All the Christian theologians

November 20, 2019 - 5 starsAiiiiiii, look at me re-reading books in the same year. Definitely did not expect to be go back to this one so soon but glad I did. Context does amazing things for your understanding. Read this one as part of class instead of just 'cause and gained so much more out of it. January 31st, 2019 Review - 4 stars Dry but thought-provoking. Obviously, it is hard to rate someone like Aristotle. For the way it shaped Western thought, Ethics easily deserves 5 stars. Yet it also

This is an excellent edition if you really want to dig your teeth into Aristotle, Sarah Broadie's near line by line commentary is great. The translation is technical and might not appeal to you if the idea of an even drier Aristotle makes you wretch, but it at least makes things less ambiguous. You could always read a different one in tandem because the commentary is really the star of this one.